New forest practices rules take effect on July 1, 1976.

  • By David Wilma
  • Posted 2/26/2003
  • Essay 5303
See Additional Media

On July 1, 1976, new forest practices rules that regulate logging and its impacts on the environment take effect. This is the first major change in the regulation of logging in 30 years. The regulations have been developed by the 11-member Forest Practices Board pursuant to legislation passed in 1973 and implemented after public hearings. The rules will evolve with scientific research, public interest, and with other regulations such as the Endangered Species Act.

In 1946, state law required reforestation as a condition of a logging permit, but compliance was uneven. In 1972, Congress passed the Clean Water Act, which regulated non-point-source pollution such as logging operations. The Washington Legislature passed the Forest Practices Act in 1973, which provided for the development of rules to guarantee sustainable yields for state, municipal, and private forests while protecting other resources. Loggers, environmentalists, other governmental agencies, treaty fishing tribes, and land developers all had a say in the process.

During the following decades, rules were added to cover scenic vistas, archeological resources, and threatened and endangered species.

Competing interests vied for attention and influence before the Forest Practices Board, resulting in an adversarial and contentious environment. Dissatisfied stakeholders took their cases to court. The board had to deal with contradictory evidence and assertions. Even when the board arrived at some decision, the affected parties could not count on the rules being sustained in court.

On Whidbey Island in 1977, a resident sued the state Department of Natural Resources to stop the sale of timber, alleging that the Department had not properly evaluated the environmental consequences (Noel v. Cole). The courts held that logging permits were not exempt from environmental assessment.

In July 1986, the Northwest Renewable Resources Center organized a conference among forest products interests, tribes, environmentalists, and government agencies to derive a new process. The result was the Timber Fish Wildlife Agreement, which provided for the parties to develop policy and regulations together, which then could be adopted by the state.


The Timber Fish Wildlife Agreement, undated pamphlet, Washington Forest Protection Association, Olympia, Washington; Sarah Flynn and Thomas Gunton, "Resolving Natural Resource Conflicts Through Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Case Study of the Timber Fish Wildlife Agreement in Washington State, Environments, Vol. 23, No. 2; Noel v. Cole, 98 Wn.2d 375, 655 P.2d 245, Washington Supreme Court (1982);  1976 WFPA Annual Report, p.11.
Note: This essay was corrected on May 12, 2008.

Licensing: This essay is licensed under a Creative Commons license that encourages reproduction with attribution. Credit should be given to both and to the author, and sources must be included with any reproduction. Click the icon for more info. Please note that this Creative Commons license applies to text only, and not to images. For more information regarding individual photos or images, please contact the source noted in the image credit.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
Major Support for Provided By: The State of Washington | Patsy Bullitt Collins | Paul G. Allen Family Foundation | Museum Of History & Industry | 4Culture (King County Lodging Tax Revenue) | City of Seattle | City of Bellevue | City of Tacoma | King County | The Peach Foundation | Microsoft Corporation, Other Public and Private Sponsors and Visitors Like You