Jimi Hendrix Clara McCarty Captain Robert Gray Anna Louise StrongAnna Louise Strong Bailey Gatzert Home WWII Women Pilots
Search Encyclopedia
Facebook
Advanced Search
Donate Now! Book Store Featured Eassy Sponsor of the Week
Home About Us Contact Us Education Bookstore Tourism Advanced Search
6771 HistoryLink.org essays now available      
Donate Subscribe

Shortcuts

Libraries
Cyberpedias Cyberpedias
Timeline Essays Timeline Essays
People's Histories People's Histories

Selected Collections
Cities & Towns Cities & Towns
County Thumbnails Counties
Biographies Biographies
Interactive Cybertours Interactive Cybertours
Slide Shows Slideshows
Public Ports Public Ports
Audio & Video Audio & Video

Research Shortcuts

Map Searches
Alphabetical Search
Timeline Date Search
Topic Search

Features

Book of the Fortnight
Audio/Video Enhanced
History Bookshelf
Klondike Gold Rush Database
Duvall Newspaper Index
Wellington Scrapbook

More History

Washington FAQs
Washington Milestones
Honor Rolls
Columbia Basin
Everett
Olympia
Seattle
Spokane
Tacoma
Walla Walla
Roads & Rails

Timeline Library

< Browse to Previous Essay | Browse to Next Essay >

Seattle Fault Zone is first described in Science on December 4, 1992.

HistoryLink.org Essay 9388 : Printer-Friendly Format

On December 4, 1992, the prestigious journal Science publishes five papers on what is now known as the Seattle Fault Zone, a previously undescribed, several-mile-wide area of crustal weakness running from about Issaquah, under Seattle's Seahawks Stadium and Safeco Field, through Alki Point and Restoration Point to Hood Canal. Using an array of seemingly disconnected evidence the reports’ authors show that roughly 1,100 years ago a massive earthquake rippled across the Seattle landscape. It is startling news because until that time few had suspected the existence of the fault.

An Abrupt Uplift: Restoration Point

Realization that a huge fault moved relatively recently in Seattle first began to gel in the late 1980s when geologist Robert Bucknam discovered that Restoration Point on Bainbridge Island had been thrust out of the water sometime less than 1,500 years ago. (Captain George Vancouver first noted this anomalous point of land during his round the world voyage of discovery.  In 1792, he and his crew were some of the first Europeans to see Puget Sound.  Vancouver wrote: "We arrived off a projecting point of land, not formed by a low sandy spit, but rising abruptly in a low cliff about ten or twelve feet from the water side" [Meany]).    

In order to better understand what had happened at Restoration Point, Bucknam teamed with University of Washington paleobotanist Estella Leopold and Eileen Hemphill-Haley, of the United States Geological Survey. The trio began by studying marsh, peat, and beach deposits from Bainbridge Island, which revealed a rapid change in elevation as one site dropped below sea level and a corresponding site popped out of the water. The evidence came from humus, peat, charcoal, and diatoms (single-celled organisms that secrete complex skeletons). Using radiocarbon dating, Bucknam, Leopold, and Hemphill-Haley bracketed the change at Restoration Point at between 500 and 1,700 years ago. 

Avalanches in the Olympics

The four other papers presented additional lines of evidence. The most distant data came from the Olympic Mountains. Five, large rock avalanches had dammed streams, which created lakes that had submerged trees. Snags collected from three of the lakes, Jefferson, Lower Dry Bed, and Spider, indicated that an earthquake occurred between 1,000 and 1,300 years ago.

Geologists in Seattle also examined a layer of fine sediment in Lake Washington, deposited by multiple, same-age, subsurface landslides that could only be set in motion by some event as ground shaking as an earthquake. The mean age for organic matter in the sediments was 1,117 years before present, plus or minus 142 years.   

Trees Submerged in Lake Washington

An analysis of Douglas fir trees from Seattle also gave a date for the last movement of the Seattle fault at about 1,100 years ago. The initial evidence came from three groves, which a fault-induced landslide had carried from their original habitat on the shores of Lake Washington to their present resting place 90 feet underwater. One stand slid off the southeast corner of Mercer Island. Another settled on the west side of the island, across from the south end of Seward Park, and the third slumped between Holmes Point and North Point near St. Edward Park, north of Kirkland.  

In 1990, three researchers pulled up several trees from the Seward Park grove, which they used to obtain radiocarbon dates. Once again, the dates were between 1,000 and 1,300 years ago. But this was not the only intriguing piece of information from these Douglas firs. Researchers also analyzed the trees' annual growth rings. 

First, they determined that the firs all died in the same year and season. Next, they compared their tree ring data with a Douglas fir found at West Point, the western most point of Magnolia Bluff. This tree, discovered in February 1992 by USGS geologist Brian Atwater, was one part of an extensive archaeological and geological record removed from a trench dug for an effluent pipe connected with the Metro sewage treatment plant. Atwater’s work showed that the dead Douglas fir had been carried by a tsunami to the beach.   

When Atwater found the tsunami-deposited log, it rested on a patch of the sand sheet and on toppled, flattened bulrush stems. Radiocarbon dating put the tree's death at between 850 and 1,350 years ago. In order to narrow this window of death and to pinpoint the date of the tsunami, Atwater compared his tree-ring widths with data from the submerged forest trees. The trees died within a half year or less or each other, most likely between 900 and 928 AD.

Combining all the various lines of evidence, researchers concluded that one day about 1,100 years ago the land south of the Seattle Fault line shot up 20 feet and the area north of it dropped at least 3 feet during a magnitude 7.5+ earthquake. Geologists also concluded that this earthquake occurred less than 10 miles beneath Seattle.

Potential Devastation

A shallow earthquake such as one that would be produced by the Seattle Fault Zone has the potential for significant damage. When a fault moves deep underground, most of its high frequency energy dissipates before reaching the surface, which reduces the level of ground shaking. In contrast, a shallow earthquake's high frequency energy remains strong at the surface. During the 1995 Kobe, Japan, and 1994 Northridge, California, earthquakes, both shallow, ground shaking ranged between 2.5 and 5 times greater than what has been recorded in subduction generated faults.   

The other problem with the Seattle Fault relates to Restoration Point; a shallow fault can pierce the surface. Considering that the last movement on the fault thrust rock 20 feet out of the Sound, ground ruptures could sever natural gas, liquid fuel, sewer, and water supply pipelines, all of which cross through the Seattle Fault zone. And this does not even address the numerous bridges and roads that an earthquake could destroy.

Since the publication of the five papers in 1992, geologists have continued to study the Seattle Fault Zone. They have found several additional strands and learned that it has moved many times in its history. They cannot predict when it will move again; they know only that it will. 

Sources:
Robert C. Bucknam, Eileen Hemphill-Haley, Estella B. Leopold, “Abrupt Uplift Within the Past 1700 Years at Southern Puget Sound,” Science, Vol. 258, (December 4, 1992), 1611-1614; Brian F. Atwater and Andrew L. Moore, “A Tsunami About 1000 Years Ago in Puget Sound, Washington, Science, Vol. 258, (December 4, 1992), 1614-1617; Robert E. Karlin and Sally E. B. Abella, “Paleoearthquakes in the Puget Sound Region Recorded in Sediments, Lake Washington, U.S.A., Science, Vol. 258, (December 4, 1992), 1617-1620; Robert L. Schuster, Robert L. Logan, and Patrick T. Pringle, “Prehistoric Rock Avalanches in the Olympic Mountains, Washington,” Science, Vol. 258, (December 4, 1992), 1620-1621; Tree Ring Correlation Between Prehistoric Landslides and Abrupt Tectonic Events in Seattle, Washington, Science, Vol. 258, (December 4, 1992), 1621-1623; Edmond Stephen Meany, Vancouver's Discovery of Puget Sound, (New York: The MacMillan Company, 1907), 128.


Travel through time (chronological order):
< Browse to Previous Essay | Browse to Next Essay >

Related Topics: Enviornment | Science & Technology |

Licensing: This essay is licensed under a Creative Commons license that encourages reproduction with attribution. Credit should be given to both HistoryLink.org and to the author, and sources must be included with any reproduction. Click the icon for more info. Please note that this Creative Commons license applies to text only, and not to images. For more information regarding individual photos or images, please contact the source noted in the image credit.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License


Major Support for HistoryLink.org Provided By: The State of Washington | Patsy Bullitt Collins | Paul G. Allen Family Foundation | Museum Of History & Industry | 4Culture (King County Lodging Tax Revenue) | City of Seattle | City of Bellevue | City of Tacoma | King County | The Peach Foundation | Microsoft Corporation, Other Public and Private Sponsors and Visitors Like You


This essay made possible by:
Peach Foundation


Restoration Point, Bainbridge Island
Courtesy Washington State Department of Ecology


 
Home About Us Contact Us Education Bookstore Tourism Advanced Search

HistoryLink.org is the first online encyclopedia of local and state history created expressly for the Internet. (SM)
HistoryLink.org is a free public and educational resource produced by History Ink, a 501 (c) (3) tax-exempt corporation.
Contact us by phone at 206.447.8140, by mail at Historylink, 1411 4th Ave. Suite 803, Seattle WA 98101 or email admin@historylink.org