|
< Browse to Previous Essay | Browse to Next Essay >
Seattle voters defeat fluoridation proposal on March 11, 1952.
HistoryLink.org Essay 4049
: Printer-Friendly Format
On March 11, 1952, Seattle voters defeat a proposal to add fluoride to city drinking water.
In January 1951, Dr. Emil Palmquist, Director of the Seattle-King County Department of Public Health, asked the City Council to treat city drinking water with fluoride to combat tooth decay in children. The Council passed ordinances to enact and fund the proposal but opposition developed. The matter was put to the voters for approval.
Supporters included the King County Medical Association, the Parent-Teacher Associations, and the Seattle Committee for Fluoridation. Voters were assured that the addition of one part per billion of fluoride would have no harmful effect, "established by the highest scientific authority" (The Seattle Times).
Among the opponents were Christian Scientists and the Anti-Fluoridation Committee, which alleged that Fluoride would discolor teeth and make teeth brittle. The Committee proclaimed, "There is no 'safe average dose'. The narrow margin of safety may cause physical harm to many" (Times). The program would also impose an unwanted intrusion by government into personal rights.
The final vote was 45,612 for and 88,168 against fluoridation. The supporters and opponents spent approximately $1,300 on the campaign.
Voters will defeat the proposal again in 1963, but pass it in 1968.
Sources:
"Water Fluoridation Plan Highlight of Tuesday Vote," The Seattle Times, March 9, 1952, p. 17; "Charter Amendment Carries," Seattle Post-Intelligencer, March 12, 1952, pp. 1, 2; HistoryLink Online Encyclopedia of Washington State History, "Seattle voters approve fluoridation of city water on November 5, 1968" (by Heather Trecases), http://www.historylink.org/.
By David Wilma, December 25, 2002
Travel through time (chronological order):
< Browse to Previous Essay
|
Browse to Next Essay >
Related Topics:
Health |
Government & Politics |
Science & Technology |
|
Licensing: This essay is licensed under a Creative Commons license that
encourages reproduction with attribution. Credit should be given to both
HistoryLink.org and to the author, and sources must be included with any
reproduction. Click the icon for more info. Please note that this
Creative Commons license applies to text only, and not to images. For
more information regarding individual photos or images, please contact
the source noted in the image credit. |
 |
Major Support for HistoryLink.org Provided
By: The State of Washington | Patsy Bullitt Collins
| Paul G. Allen Family Foundation | Museum Of History & Industry
| 4Culture (King County Lodging Tax Revenue) | City of Seattle
| City of Bellevue | City of Tacoma | King County | The Peach
Foundation | Microsoft Corporation, Other Public and Private
Sponsors and Visitors Like You
|