This Week / Home
Search Encyclopedia
Advanced Search
Home About Us Fun & Travel Education Contact Us Sponsors Advanced Search
5495 HistoryLink.org essays now available      
Donate Subscribe

Shortcuts

Libraries
Cyberpedias Cyberpedias
Timeline Essays Timeline Essays
People's Histories People's Histories

Selected Collections
Cities & Towns Cities & Towns
County Thumbnails County Thumbnails
Biographies Biographies
Interactive Cybertours Interactive Cybertours
Slide Shows Slide Shows

Research Shortcuts

Map Searches
Alphabetical Search
Timeline Date Search
Topic Search
Links

Features

History Bytes
Book of the Fortnight
History Bookshelf
Past/Forward Calendar
Klondike Gold Rush Database
Duvall Newspaper Index
Wellington Scrapbook

More History

Washington FAQs
Washington Milestones
Honor Rolls
Columbia Basin
Everett
Olympia
Seattle
Spokane
Tacoma
Walla Walla
Roads & Rails

History Networking

Facebook Facebook
Twitter Twitter
   

Timeline Library

< Browse to Previous Essay | Browse to Next Essay >

Seattle voters defeat fluoridation proposal on March 11, 1952.

HistoryLink.org Essay 4049 : Printer-Friendly Format

On March 11, 1952, Seattle voters defeat a proposal to add fluoride to city drinking water.

In January 1951, Dr. Emil Palmquist, Director of the Seattle-King County Department of Public Health, asked the City Council to treat city drinking water with fluoride to combat tooth decay in children. The Council passed ordinances to enact and fund the proposal but opposition developed. The matter was put to the voters for approval.

Supporters included the King County Medical Association, the Parent-Teacher Associations, and the Seattle Committee for Fluoridation. Voters were assured that the addition of one part per billion of fluoride would have no harmful effect, "established by the highest scientific authority" (The Seattle Times).

Among the opponents were Christian Scientists and the Anti-Fluoridation Committee, which alleged that Fluoride would discolor teeth and make teeth brittle. The Committee proclaimed, "There is no 'safe average dose'. The narrow margin of safety may cause physical harm to many" (Times). The program would also impose an unwanted intrusion by government into personal rights.

The final vote was 45,612 for and 88,168 against fluoridation. The supporters and opponents spent approximately $1,300 on the campaign.

Voters will defeat the proposal again in 1963, but pass it in 1968.

Sources:
"Water Fluoridation Plan Highlight of Tuesday Vote," The Seattle Times, March 9, 1952, p. 17; "Charter Amendment Carries," Seattle Post-Intelligencer, March 12, 1952, pp. 1, 2; HistoryLink Online Encyclopedia of Washington State History, "Seattle voters approve fluoridation of city water on November 5, 1968" (by Heather Trecases), http://www.historylink.org/.

More information: < Browse to Previous Essay | Browse to Next Essay > | Search |
Related Topics: Health | Government & Politics |

Major Support for HistoryLink.org Provided By: The State of Washington | Patsy Bullitt Collins | Paul G. Allen Family Foundation | Museum Of History & Industry | 4Culture (King County Lodging Tax Revenue) | City of Seattle | City of Bellevue | City of Tacoma | King County | The Peach Foundation | Microsoft Corporation, Other Public and Private Sponsors and Visitors Like You

This file made possible by:
Seattle Public Utilities


Newspaper ad opposing water fluoridation, March 9, 1952.
Courtesy Seattle Public Library


 
Home About Us Fun & Travel Education Contact Us Sponsors Advanced Search

HistoryLink.org is the first online encyclopedia of local and state history created expressly for the Internet. (SM)
HistoryLink.org is a free public and educational resource produced by History Ink, a 501 (c) (3) tax-exempt corporation.

USO Clubs in Tacoma Sponsor of the Week History Bytes