Captain George Vancouver Julia Butler Hansen Carlos Bulosan Ernestine Anderson Kurt Cobain Bill Gates & Paul Allen Home
Search Encyclopedia
Advanced Search
Featured Essay
Home About Us Contact Us Education Bookstore Tourism Advanced Search
7100 essays now available      
Donation system not supported by Safari     Donate Subscribe


Cyberpedias Cyberpedias
Timeline Essays Timeline Essays
People's Histories People's Histories

Selected Collections
Cities & Towns Cities & Towns
County Thumbnails Counties
Biographies Biographies
Interactive Cybertours Interactive Cybertours
Slide Shows Slideshows
Public Ports Public Ports
Audio & Video Audio & Video

Research Shortcuts

Map Searches
Alphabetical Search
Timeline Date Search
Topic Search


Book of the Fortnight
Audio/Video Enhanced
History Bookshelf
Klondike Gold Rush Database
Duvall Newspaper Index
Wellington Scrapbook

More History

Washington FAQs
Washington Milestones
Honor Rolls
Columbia Basin
Walla Walla
Roads & Rails

Timeline Library

< Browse to Previous Essay | Browse to Next Essay >

Seattle voters reject district city council elections and Rich Man's Charter on November 2, 1926. Essay 3768 : Printer-Friendly Format

On November 2, 1926, Seattle voters reject a city charter proposal that includes a city manager, a return to district elections, and salaries of $600 a year for city council members. Opponents call the proposal "The Rich Man's Charter."

In March 1926, voters narrowly rejected a city manager for municipal government and at the same time approved a slate of freeholders to draw up a new city charter. The freeholders represented business interests in the city. The chairman was from Puget Sound Power and Light. The committee came up with a system by which a "business manager" would run city departments (except police). The departments of water and lighting would be combined, voters would approve all bond issues, utility rates would be fixed in Olympia, and the council would consist of members elected, two to a district.

The Seattle Times called the proposal "a splendid document." City Light Superintendent James D. "J.D." Ross (1872-1939) saw the continuing threat of private utility ownership and called upon the newly organized Friends of City Light to oppose the plan. The Municipal League, labor, and Mayor Bertha Landes (1868-1943) also advocated rejection.

The measure was "roundly rejected" (Berner, 93), with 30,900 voters against and 20,291 for.

Richard C. Berner, Seattle, 1921-1940: Boom To Bust (Seattle: Charles Press, 1991), 80-94.

Travel through time (chronological order):
< Browse to Previous Essay | Browse to Next Essay >

Related Topics: Government & Politics |

Licensing: This essay is licensed under a Creative Commons license that encourages reproduction with attribution. Credit should be given to both and to the author, and sources must be included with any reproduction. Click the icon for more info. Please note that this Creative Commons license applies to text only, and not to images. For more information regarding individual photos or images, please contact the source noted in the image credit.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License

Major Support for Provided By: The State of Washington | Patsy Bullitt Collins | Paul G. Allen Family Foundation | Museum Of History & Industry | 4Culture (King County Lodging Tax Revenue) | City of Seattle | City of Bellevue | City of Tacoma | King County | The Peach Foundation | Microsoft Corporation, Other Public and Private Sponsors and Visitors Like You

Home About Us Contact Us Education Bookstore Tourism Advanced Search is the first online encyclopedia of local and state history created expressly for the Internet. (SM) is a free public and educational resource produced by History Ink, a 501 (c) (3) tax-exempt corporation.
Contact us by phone at 206.447.8140, by mail at Historylink, 1411 4th Ave. Suite 803, Seattle WA 98101 or email