< Browse to Previous Essay | Browse to Next Essay >
Ralph Seeley, attorney and advocate for medical marijuana, dies on January 21, 1998.
HistoryLink.org Essay 10282
: Printer-Friendly Format
On January 21, 1998, Tacoma attorney Ralph L. Seeley (1948-1998) succumbs to a cancer that has tormented him for more than a decade. Diagnosed in 1986 with chordoma, a rare bone cancer that starts in the spine, Seeley endures a dozen surgeries and several courses of chemotherapy and radiation therapy that cause severe nausea, vomiting, and debilitation. He finds that smoking marijuana, which his doctors cannot legally prescribe, provides much greater relief than any of the medications that are permitted under the law. Seeley sues the State of Washington, asking that it be compelled to reclassify marijuana as a drug that can be prescribed. A Pierce County superior court judge rules in Seeley's favor, but the State will appeal. In July 1997, the Washington State Supreme Court reverses the ruling of the lower court, holding that the State's prohibition of medical marijuana was rationally related to the legitimate goals of preventing drug abuse and protecting the public from untested medications. Less than six months later, Seeley is dead, but the cause he fought for is not. In less than a year, Washington's voters will overwhelmingly approve Initiative 692, which permits qualifying patients to obtain prescriptions for "medical marijuana." Fourteen years later, voters will approve another initiative, this time legalizing the recreational use of marijuana by adults.
A Man of Many Parts
L. Seeley was born in Spokane, Washington, on December 6, 1948, one of three children
of Air Force Major Karl Seeley and Peggy Seeley. He joined the navy after
graduation from high school, serving six years on nuclear subs and singing in
the Navy's renowned Blue Jackets Choir. Following his discharge, Seeley earned
a journalism degree at Evergreen State College in Olympia and went to work as a
reporter and columnist for the Bremerton Sun and Tacoma News Tribune
newspapers. He was also a small-plane pilot and managing editor of Western Flyer, a regional aviation newsletter.
His other interests included classical music and fly fishing.
1986, Seeley was diagnosed with chordoma, a rare cancer that afflicts only
about one in a million people, mostly men, and mostly between the ages of 40
and 70. Tumors first appear somewhere along the spine between the skull and the
tailbone. It is a slow-growing cancer,
but often, as in Seeley's case, it metastasizes to other areas, including vital
organs. The spinal tumors alone can cause severe pain, partial paralysis, and
bowel and bladder dysfunction.
endured 12 years of treatment, including several rounds of chemotherapy and
radiation therapy. He had eight surgical procedures on his spine alone and two that removed all of his right lung and a
portion of his left. The cancer eventually invaded his liver, his sacrum, and
even the gluteus muscles of his buttocks.
His chemotherapy-induced suffering was graphically described in a law review
article written shortly after his death:
the course of chemotherapy, Mr. Seeley became so violently ill that he
considered discontinuing the treatment and allowing the disease to run its
course. He described the nausea that resulted from the chemotherapy as 'the
most debilitating pain I have ever experienced ... . [C]hemotherapy-induced nausea is not an
"upset tummy." It is violent,
unrelenting retching and gagging, often accompanied by an uncontrollable
release of bowel control.' Mr.
Seeley's suffering from chemotherapy
included hours of agony ending with minutes of lying helpless on the hospital
floor, curled in a fetal position, covered with his own vomit and excrement,
and unable to pull the 'nurse-call' cord a few inches from his face"
("In Memoriam: Ralph Seeley").
his ordeals, Seeley decided on a career change, and in 1991 he enrolled in the
night-school law program at the University of Puget Sound, graduating in 1993.
He married one of his classmates, Judith Tuffias, and upon graduation went to
work for veteran Tacoma attorney and former state senator Neil Hoff
(1921-2005). Just two years later Seeley, in his first court trial, won a
$9-million jury verdict against the State of Washington, representing a
pharmacist who claimed his First Amendment right of free speech was violated
when he was demoted at Western State Hospital after criticizing personnel
policies. That verdict would be overturned by the State Court of Appeals the following
year, but the case marked Seeley as an attorney to be reckoned with.
Marijuana as Medicine
severe reaction to chemotherapy led his medical providers to prescribe various
drugs to try to stem the nausea and pain, including the synthetic form of
tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the primary active ingredient in marijuana, marketed
under the name Marinol and approved for prescription by the State pharmacy
board. It was only mildly helpful and had several downsides. It took hours for
the drug, in pill form, to be absorbed into the system and take effect. Since waves
of nausea would hit Seeley at unpredictable times, Marinol provided little
relief. In addition, once it did take effect, the "high" caused by THC
would last for up to 14 hours. This compromised Seeley's reading comprehension and
ability to speak with clarity, both skills that were integral to his ability to
practice law. If that was not enough, Seeley would often be so nauseated when
he took the Marinol pill that he promptly vomited it up. With a typical touch of humor,
he summed up his experiences to a reporter for The Seattle Times:
"it makes you very high for a very long time. You take a tablet at 10 a.m., at
noon the next day, you're still losing arguments with the doorknob"
("Selling Just What Doctor Can't Order ... ").
one of Seeley's physicians recommended that he try smoking marijuana to relieve
his symptoms. Seeley consulted with other cancer patients who had found relief
that way, then tried it himself. He obtained his marijuana from Joanna McKee of
Green Cross Patient Co-op on Bainbridge
Island, who risked prosecution by providing marijuana to a network of people
suffering from AIDS, multiple sclerosis, and cancer. (McKee would eventually be
charged, but the case was thrown out when a judge ruled that the search warrant
used to seize 162 marijuana plants was faulty.)
smoked marijuana gave Seeley relief that all the other anti-nausea agents,
including Marinol, had failed to provide. The antiemetic effects were nearly
instantaneous, unlike the pill form of THC. Almost as important to Seeley, the
effects of smoking marijuana wore off much faster than those resulting from
ingesting Marinol. He knew that his cancer was incurable and would eventually
lead to his death, but smoking marijuana at least helped improve Seeley's quality
of life and enabled him to continue in the practice of law. Quoted again in The Seattle Times, Seeley said:
"What I discovered is if I relied on legal medication, I would be very sick for
a very long time and watch a lot of $3.11 tablets disappear down the toilet.
And if I got one down, I'd ruin the next day, be so damned stoned I couldn't
function. But if I smoked marijuana, five or 10 minutes later, I'm done. I'm
fine" ("Selling Just What Doctor Can't Order ... ").
Taking On the State
no doubt could have continued to obtain marijuana, either from Green Cross
Patient Coop or from other sources. After all, its use had been commonplace in
America ever since the 1960s. Despite its illegality, it was readily available,
and mere possession of the drug was rarely prosecuted aggressively in
Washington state. But Seeley was
outraged by the Green Cross bust, and by the fact that both State and Federal
law continued to classify marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug having "no
currently accepted medical use in the United States, a lack of accepted safety
for use under medical supervision, and a high potential for abuse" ("Definition
of Controlled Substance Schedules").
Facing death, suffering greatly, and getting effective
and reliable relief only from smoking marijuana, Seeley begged to differ. But
the Schedule 1 classification put marijuana in the same category as heroin and
other indisputably dangerous drugs (and a few others that, like marijuana, many
believed did not belong on the list). This meant that Seeley's doctors were
unable to prescribe marijuana for him, even if they were convinced to a medical
certainty that it was the most effective treatment for his symptoms.
from obtaining legally what he considered to be vital medicine, Seeley filed
suit in the Pierce County Superior Court against the State of Washington. He
asked the court to declare that the classification of marijuana as a Schedule 1
drug violated the Privileges and Immunities clause and the Equal Protection
clause of both the United States Constitution and the Washington State Constitution. In his brief to
the court, Seeley said:
"The plaintiff is denied the privilege of ending his suffering by the use of a
therapeutic drug while others are granted the privilege of ending their
suffering with access to far more harmful and addictive drugs, such as
morphine, cocaine, amphetamines, barbiturates and opium" (Brief of
Petitioner, Seeley v. State, Pierce
County Superior Court Cause No. 94-2-11862-1).
asked that the court order the State Board of Pharmacy to reclassify marijuana as
a Schedule 2 drug, which would allow medical providers to prescribe it for
patients. Among the other Schedule 2 drugs were cocaine, amphetamines, and morphine,
hardly harmless substances, yet available
to patients with a doctor's prescription. Illogically, Marinol, the problematic
synthetic THC that had failed to provide Seeley with relief, was classified as a Schedule 2 drug, whereas the plant that produced THC naturally
was considered by the government to be of no medical value whatsoever and put in Schedule 1.
suit was heard by Judge Roseanne Buckner, and it was widely anticipated that
she would uphold the State's classification system. But Seeley had persuasive
support. One of his doctors, orthopedic surgeon
Ernest Conrad, despite some concerns about its effects on Seeley's compromised
respiratory system, stated that he would prescribe marijuana for him if he
could. As he explained:
"I don't personally feel like withholding that from him. It's a matter of
what you think is reasonable for a terminal patient" ("Selling Just
What Doctor Can't Order ... ").
To the surprise of most court observers, Judge Buckner
granted Seeley's request for a declaratory judgment, ruling that the State must
reclassify marijuana and make it legal for doctors to prescribe to patients
whom they believed would benefit. In her decision, Buckner balanced the interests
of patients like Seeley, who claimed marijuana provided relief that no legal
drug did, against the interests of the State in keeping it on Schedule 1. She
found that the patients' rights should prevail, and ordered the State Board of
Pharmacy to reclassify marijuana. Seeley was of course pleased, as was McKee of
the Green Cross coop. In a prediction that would eventually be borne out, she told
The Seattle Times:
"If Ralph lives long enough, marijuana will be a
Schedule 2 drug in the state of Washington, in which case it will be the most
advanced state in the country. Medical marijuana is the Achilles' heel of the
drug war. Unless they figure that out and leave us alone, they'll keep losing"
("Judge Rules For Marijuana As Prescription").
A Reversal and an
McKee's confident prediction seemed premature when the
attorney-general's office appealed Judge Buckner's ruling to the State Supreme
Court and won a reversal of her decision. Justice Barbara Madsen authored the
opinion and was joined by seven of the court's
other eight justices. Brushing aside all arguments to the contrary, the court
ruled that Seeley and others like him had no "fundamental right" to
obtain medical marijuana by prescription, and that the State's Schedule 1 classification was within its sound discretion and supported by a "rational
basis" (Seeley v. State).
One justice disagreed, and wrote a scorching dissenting
opinion that soon became legendary in the legal community. Richard B. Sanders,
who in 1995 had been elected to fill a partial term in a vacant seat on the court, was a philosophical libertarian with an abiding suspicion of government overreach. His dissent opened with a quote from
journalist Joseph Sobran: "When our
rulers worry about our health, we should worry about our liberty" (Seeley v. State). This was to be about the most gentle comment
Justice Sanders had to make, either about the State's classification of marijuana or the
ruling of the eight other justices. He opened with some general observations:
"[Seeley] comes to court on his own behalf to argue a
matter of a very personal nature directly pertaining to physical pain which
only he can experience. By contrast considerations of public need and necessity
are at most lawyer-like abstractions. Refusing palliative relief to a dying man may please the politicians yet
does great damage to Seeley's liberty and nothing for his health."
Sanders was just getting warmed up, and he next lit into the State:
"the State purports to justify this total prohibition of marijuana by
taking a 'larger focus.' It asserts
absolute criminal prohibition, even as applied to Mr. Seeley, promotes
legitimate governmental objectives associated with
discouraging drug abuse and otherwise protecting the citizenry from itself by
curtailing what it alleges to be the unknown consequences associated with the
inhalation of marijuana. But these
reasons even if valid have no particular application to Seeley, who is terminally
ill, admittedly finds relief in smoking marijuana, and seeks to follow the advice of his own
physician who attests marijuana is medically advisable. From the perspective of one writhing in
nausea on the tiled floor of an oncological recovery room, the State's
justifications to withhold the blessings of relief are more sophomoric than
Nor did Sanders spare his fellow jurists:
"I wonder how many minutes of Seeley's agony the
Legislature and/or the majority of this court would endure before seeing the
light. Words are insufficient to convey the needless suffering which the merciless
State has imposed" (Seeley v. State of Washington, dissent
of Justice Sanders).
Sanders dissent was unusually direct, heartfelt, and
powerful, but didn't rely only on the obvious emotional appeals of the case. He
fully analyzed the legal issues and concluded, unlike the majority, that
Seeley's arguments were not only morally just, but legally correct.
Death Comes to Ralph
It can be seriously doubted that Ralph Seeley lived out the
few short months he had left without the relief he had found with marijuana.
His suit against the State clearly had less to do with his ability to obtain
marijuana than with the state and federal governments' classification of it as a Schedule 1 drug.
The Supreme Court issued its decision reversing Judge
Buckner on July 24, 1997; Ralph Seeley died just less than six months later, on
January 21, 1998, at the age of 49. He had endured a more than a decade-long struggle against a relentless cancer and
the toxic treatments needed to keep it temporarily at bay.
The following November, voters in Washington state handily passed
Initiative 692, which read in part:
with terminal or debilitating illnesses who, in the judgment of their
physicians, would benefit from the medical use of marijuana, shall not be found
guilty of a crime under state law for their possession and limited use of
marijuana" ("Complete Text of Initiative 692").
Fourteen years later,
Washington voters took the next step. On November 6, 2012, Initiative 502 was
passed, legalizing the possession and use of marijuana by adults. The election
was not even close. Although 20 Washington counties opposed the measure and
only 19 approved, it received strong support in Western Washington and in
Chelan, Okanogan, Ferry, Spokane, and Whitman counties east of the Cascades. The
final vote tally was 1,724,209 (55.7%) in favor and 1,371,235 (44.3%) opposed. The
long legal battles that Ralph Seeley's agonies had helped start had finally come to an end.
1998 Election: State Ballot Measures -- Complete Text of Initiative 692, Washington State Secretary of State website accessed December 5, 2012 (http://www.sos.wa.gov/elections/1998/i692_text.aspx); Wilson v. State of Washington, 84 Wn. App. 332 (Division Two, December 1996);
Seeley v. State of Washington, 132
Wash. 2d 776 (1997); "Definition of Controlled Substance Schedules,"
Drug Enforcement Administration Office of Diversion Control website accessed
December 14, 2012 (http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/schedules/index.html#define);
Brief of Petitioner, Seeley v. State of
Washington, Pierce County Superior Court Cause No. 94-2-11862-1 (1995); "In
Memoriam: Ralph Seeley," Equal Rights 4 All website accessed December 12,
Carol M. Ostrom, "Selling Just What
Doctor Can't Order -- Trial To Test Backers Of Marijuana As Medicine," The Seattle Times, May 29, 1995, p. A-1;
Carol M. Ostrom, "Judge Rules For Marijuana As Prescription," Ibid.,
October 14, 1995, p. A-8; Jane Hadley, "State Marijuana Ban Ruled
Post-Intelligencer, October 14, 1995; Bruce Rushton, "Ralph Seeley, a
Columnist, Lawyer and Fighter, Dies at 49," Tacoma News Tribune, January 22, 1998; Aryeh Y. Brown, "In Memoriam: Ralph Seeley," Seattle University Law Review, Vo. 22, No. 175 (1998); Kristiana L. Farris, ”Seeley v. State: The Need for Definitional Balancing in Washington Substantive Due Process Law," Washington Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 3 (July 1998).
Travel through time (chronological order):
< Browse to Previous Essay
Browse to Next Essay >
Licensing: This essay is licensed under a Creative Commons license that
encourages reproduction with attribution. Credit should be given to both
HistoryLink.org and to the author, and sources must be included with any
reproduction. Click the icon for more info. Please note that this
Creative Commons license applies to text only, and not to images. For
more information regarding individual photos or images, please contact
the source noted in the image credit.
Major Support for HistoryLink.org Provided
By: The State of Washington | Patsy Bullitt Collins
| Paul G. Allen Family Foundation | Museum Of History & Industry
| 4Culture (King County Lodging Tax Revenue) | City of Seattle
| City of Bellevue | City of Tacoma | King County | The Peach
Foundation | Microsoft Corporation, Other Public and Private
Sponsors and Visitors Like You
Ralph Seeley (1948-1998), ca. 1995